
My book club finished reading
Dracula for our last meeting. We had read
Frankenstein a couple years earlier and only thought it appropriate to read
Dracula as well.
It got high grades for being written long ago in a very unique perspective. It is written as entries from the journals of the characters involved. Surprisingly, there were very few "horror" scenes at all. In fact, almost none. It certainly was unlike any of the modern day depictions of Dracula on the big screen. If you made a movie of the book as it is written it would be a flop for certain. But as it is, it is an entertaining book.
If you had to choose between the two, I'd still choose Frankenstein. I believe it has more action to it, is written in an easier style and carries with it more profound insights.
I'm eager to report on this month's book: Thunderstruck. We have already read Devil in the White City by Larson. If you haven't read that and like a great murder mystery you've got to read it. The wonderful thing about it (the book, not the murders), is that it historical. It is the story of the murders that occurred during the World's Fair in Chicago in the early 20th century. It is a fascinating book. I'll let you know if his latest book rivals that one.